Slowvember Writing
 
 
 

In response to my recent  post about my November 30-day Writing with Pleasure Challenge, subscriber Tineke D'Haeseleer wrote:

  • I am so happy to hear about your alternative to the madness of NaNoWriMo and its derivatives. In the art world (and particularly on Instagram), #inktober is the big "draw every day" equivalent that sends everybody scurrying for their inks and pens and paper. Since a few years, there is a follow-up art challenge called #slowvember (initiated by illustrator Lee White), where you spend an entire month on the same piece of art. It's aimed to counter the productivity hype and savour the slow process of discovering what you really want to say with that art.

So what might Slowvember look like for writers? Participants in writing challenges already tend to work on the same piece of writing all month. But their goal is volume and velocity, not the acquisition of new skills or the slow wonder of discovery.

As any serious athlete knows – and as Aesop's patient tortoise taught the hasty hare – sometimes you have to slow down to move forward. In the words of authorAnne Lamott, "Almost everything will work again if you unplug it for a few minutes, including you."

Here are a few suggestions for slowing down your writing this Slowvember and beyond:

  • Read. Virtually any book can help you become a more contemplative and craft-focused writer. You might want to start by choosing one that has the word slow in the title: for example, The Art of Slow Writing by Louise de Salvo or The Slow Professor by Maggie Berg and Barbara Seeger.

  • Relish. The more you enjoy writing, the more you'll write. My 30-day Writing with Pleasure Challenge provides you with prompts for writing with pleasure every day throughout November. It's not too late to slow down and join us!

  • Retreat. I know of no better way to unplug and reset than by treating yourself to a writing retreat, preferably in a beautiful location and in the company of fellow writers. Speaking of which – there's still space available in my 2023 writing retreats: Island Time on Waiheke Island in New Zealand and Mountain Rise in Wengen, Switzerland. Something to look forward to even in the cold November rain!

This Slowvember, why not set yourself the delicious challenge of moving forward by slowing down?


Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year). Not a member? Join the WriteSPACE now and get your first 30 days free.


 
30-Day Writing Challenge
 
 
 

Here comes November, the month when writers around the world sharpen their pencils or fire up their computers and get ready to write – a lot. So it’s time for my annual 30-day Writing with Pleasure Challenge.

You can sign up for National Novel Writing Month, aka NaNoWriMo, and pledge to write 50,ooo words in 30 days.  Or perhaps you'd rather hook up with one of NaNoWriMo's younger siblings, such as NaPoWriMo ("30 poems in 30 days") or AcWritMo (hashtag #acwrimo), an informal network of academic writers who adhere to these 6 rules:

  1. You have to decide on a goal where you count either words, hours or projects.

  2. You declare your goal by signing up on the ‘Accountability Spreadsheet’.

  3. You then draft your approach to the month, making sure you have done enough preparation to write a lot.

  4. You discuss your progress on social media like Twitter and Facebook.

  5. You have to work really hard and not get distracted.

  6. And at the end you must publicly declare your results on the spreadsheet or on social media.

If all this sounds appealing to you, then by all means go for it!  Write your entire novel or draft your PhD dissertation during a disciplined month of working "really hard" – and please don't forget to post about it on social media so that the rest of us can be reminded what lazy sluggards we are in comparison.

But if you'd prefer to take a more joyful and less punitive approach to daily writing, my free 30-day Writing with Pleasure Challenge offers a very different kind of writing challenge, prompting you to write with pleasure for at least 25 minutes a day every day for 30 days. 

If you make it through the full series of 30 daily prompts, you'll have a lot of fun along the way -- but if you miss a few days here and there, that's okay too.  This exercise is all about finding pleasure in writing, which sometimes means taking a day off from writing.

Please forward the registration link widely and encourage other writers to join the fun!  

I look forward (with pleasure!) to seeing you there.


Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year). Not a member? Join the WriteSPACE now and get your first 30 days free.


 
KISS don't TELL
 
 
 

At some point in your writing life, you may have been given well-meaning advice spelled out via the acronym KISS:  

Keep It Simple, Stupid!

Personally, I refuse to dishonor intelligent, hardworking writers with such a mean-spirited harangue. Keep It Short and Simple – fair enough.  By why throw in that gratuitous Stupid?

As an alternative, I've come up with the formulation KISS don't TELL

Keep It Stylish, Sunshine!
don't
T
urn Everything Long and Laborious

Earlier this week, as a writing warm-up at my weekly Virtual Writing Studio, I invited participants to spell out their own versions of KISS don't TELL – or, if they preferred, to propose creative variations. As usual, they came up with some wonderfully inventive and playful responses:

  • KISS don't TELL: Keep It Sharp and Simple; don't Take Enjoyment, Let the reader Live in the writing! (Jennifer, Australia)

  • KISS don't TELL: Kindle Inquiry, Suggest Satisfaction; don't Torture Everyone with Lengthy Lines (Anita, South Africa)

  • CRISP don't SPELL: Create, Return, Inspire, Shape, Play; don't be Serious, Prohibit, Evaluate, Lonely, Loathe (Nina, Australia)

  • KISS don't TELL: Keep It Short and Simple; don't use Tremendously Elegant Luxury Language (Hannah, UK)

  • KISS don't TELL:

    Keep
    In mind that you are
    Smart with your genuine creativity
    Start to write anytime anywhere

    do not

    T
    hink too much but
    Enjoy your writing with your own
    Language and make your meaningful
    Legacy on earth

    (Grace, Texas, USA)


Excellent advice all round! 

However, I'm well aware that Keeping It Short, Sharp, Smart, and Simple is not such a simple matter — especially when we feel pressured to impress our peers by Turning Everything Long and Laborious and Torturing Everyone with Lengthy Lines.

That's why I've devoted much of my adult life to writing books, developing online tools, and facilitating workshops, courses, and retreats for academic and professional writers who want to let the sunshine in but can't quite figure out how. If you're ready for another shot at that elusive KISS, this website offers an array of targeted resources for you to try.

Writing clear, elegant, engaging prose is a craft that anyone can learn — and I'm here to help you. You may wish to start by taking my “What’s Your Writing Roadblock?” quiz.

Keep It Stylish, Sunshine!  


Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year). Not a member? Join the WriteSPACE now and get your first 30 days free.


 
Seven Secrets of Productive Writers
 
 
 

My new Productivity Catalyst kicked off this weekend, and we are going to have a blast!  

It's not to late for you to register for this action-packed 8-week course.

The "seven secrets of productive writers" that I'll be revealing week by week aren't really secrets at all, of course. They're based on extensive scholarly research and my decades of experience working with academic and professional writers. I'll show you how to:

  1. Take Time
    Identify your personal time traps and acquire a toolbox of powerful techniques for spending time, befriending time, and bending time to your will.

  2. Make Space
    Design a nourishing physical and emotional environment where you can write new words, invite new ideas, and delight in new knowledge.

  3. Find Flow
    Discover the varieties of optimal experience as you try out new rhythms, rituals, and routines for finding and maintaining flow.

  4. Cultivate Craft
    Diagnose your weak points and sharpen your style as we focus on the pleasures, frustrations, and challenges of wordcraft.

  5. Cherish Community
    Identify, establish, and/or revive a supportive community of writers committed to nurturing each other’s writing practice.

  6. Spark Joy
    Infuse your writing with pleasure and passion by reframing your negative emotions about the writing process and reclaiming your positive ones.

  7. Bring Balance
    Integrate these principles into your own everyday writing practice through guided experiments, online interactions, and live small-group coaching.

Each week throughout the course, you'll have opportunities to meet with me and your fellow participants in the WriteSPACE Virtual Writing Studio for a live breakout room discussion. Best of all, WriteSPACE members get a 10% discount!

Come join us in the Productivity Catalyst and find out how to transform your writing habits — and habits of mind — forever.


Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year). Not a member? Join the WriteSPACE now and get your first 30 days free.


 
Writing and Deep Practice
 
 
 

How can concepts such as deep practice, deliberate practice, and ultralearning help you become a more productive and confident writer?

I was lucky enough to get to discuss these questions and many others in my wide-ranging conversation with Professor Patricia Goodson on Wednesday September 7.

Pat is a Professor at Texas A&M University and the author of two excellent books on academic writing:

In the first hour of this live 2-hour WriteSPACE Special Event, we talked about Pat’s books, her extensive work with faculty and student writers, and her own deep dive into deep practice. The second hour featured a hands-on workshop in which we experimented with these concepts in our own writing.

Here’s WriteSPACE member Nina Ginsberg’s lively account of the live event:

…………….

What could be more inspiring than hearing two international experts of academic writing talking writing?? This session was an informative and entertaining romp through the various stages and phases of writing poise, practice and passion.

A few standout quotes from this session: 

  • “Paced, productive and powerful ...and pleasure! The connections between productivity and pleasure - and pleasure is as important a skill as all the other writing capacities.” 

  • “Learning how to like writing: connect to writers and learn from the masters.” 

  • “The more complex the (writing) task, the more complex the system you need to complete it.” 

  • “The more effortless the writing seems, the more work has gone into it.” 

We started by tracing Pat’s eclectic background from first studying Linguistics in Brazil, to researching Maternal and Child Health, to a Master of Philosophy of Education in Brazil (learning from and meeting Paulo Freire and his mentees), to another Masters (this time in Theology in the US), then to a PhD in Health Education. Phew! The moment she began her tenure journey as an Associate Professor was the moment writing pressure and a focus on writing began. Pat’s work on a graduate school peer-to-peer writing development support service she established morphed into a popular course, and it was from this project that her book Becoming an Academic Writer emerged. 

Pat talked about her latest book 90 days, 90 ways and showed examples of how it hones in on the connection between pleasure and productivity. I was surprised to find out that Patricia learnt how to self-publish this book on Amazon as I had just assumed it was a mainstream publication. 

It was especially interesting hearing Helen and Pat’s discussion on how their thinking about writing has changed over time and what experiences and research inform their approaches to writing. Helen uses metaphors and stories, promotes flexible and pleasurable ways of thinking about writing, offers the writing BASE to consider the dimensions of writing, questions the ubiquitous ‘write every day’ mantra, and posits that writing strategies are more like a smorgasbord than a formula. Pat mentioned the impact of decision fatigue, being aware of creative energy flows, how kinesiology research explains the link between writing and sleep within a 24-hour period, and the need to feed your writer’s unconscious mind with little bits of ‘food’ information – even if it is 5 mins a day. I liked Pat’s analogy of the writer’s mind being a hard-working graduate assistant. Pat explained how research into ‘complex adaptive systems’ and ‘complex dynamic systems’ helps her appreciate how complex writing is, and that using writing strategies in isolation is not particularly useful. Instead, she is working to develop a ‘systems approach’ or a set of elements that interact to progress writing, which she identifies as: 

A set of strategies – write every day, Pomodoros ... 

A set of tools – online or other resources writer's use (Pro Writing Aid, Grammarly...) 

A set of support – feedback, and other social, emotional, and instrumental help .... 

Pat finished off the first hour by explaining how (re)learning classical guitar online helped reinforce the principles of Contextual Interference and Deep Deliberate Practice (DDP). Patricia outlined the three key features of DDP and noted that she is now applying these to writing. The three DDP features are: 1) it slows you down and so helps with focus, attention, and intention, 2) establish a mini goal for that practice session, and 3) get immediate feedback (if you can build it in). The discussion then went into the ways practice encourages us to go deeper with our writing and how some strategies can force you to focus on becoming a better writer, but doing it in ways that might not be that difficult. 

After a break, we dove straight into the writing workshop. We explored how we might use Contextual Interference for academic writing. Pat recommended Helen’s Creativity Catalyst as a place to find provocative and inspiring academic writing activities. Pat suggested a few activities that play with contextual interference in academic writing, such as; write a journal article purpose statement as a short poem, write every other word within a sentence, or write your work backwards, or start by writing what you think will be the last sentence of your paper, then write the sentence before it, and work your way backwards. The idea with this is to make writing more difficult because this often gives clarity that was not there before.  

And finally, Pat ran us through a 15-minute activity to highlight how we practice in writing sessions. Using a triangle with three words (one word at each point): plan – do – reflect, we iteratively cycled around the triangle pushing to learn more. This process focuses on improving the quality of our writing – and improving ourselves as a writer. It was a remarkably interesting experiment to do – give it a go yourself! 

This session certainly gave us lots of interesting ideas and writing challenges to take away and ponder. 

A big thank you to both Pat and Helen for sharing their ideas and expertise so generously during this event. 

A recording of this WriteSPACE Special Event is now available for members in the WriteSPACE Library.

Not a member yet? Register here to receive an email with the video link.

Better yet, join the WriteSPACE with a free 30 day trial, and access our full Library of videos and other writing resources.


Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year).


 
Under the Twitter Tree
 
A collage depicting a garden with a tree and a log cabin
 
 

NEWS FLASH: After many years as a certified Twitterphobe, I've finally caved in and signed on to both Twitter and Instagram.  (I'm also on LinkedIn; but I'm holding the line with Facebook).

My mission is to bring creativity, color, and pleasure to the world of academic and professional writing, one Twittertweet or Instatreat at a time. Please follow me @helens_word.  

If, like me, you're a newbie in the Twittersphere/Instaverse, you're welcome to hang back and watch as I take my own halting baby steps. But if you're already a confident power user – as I know many of you are – I'd be grateful if you could work some of your social media magic to help me grow my audience.

I've just posted a bouquet of old newsletter collages and blog links to both platforms so that you'll have plenty of fun stuff to like, share, and retweet. Next I plan to publish my 10-part Write Like Freddie series, with some bonus photos at the end.

But but but but but but – have I mentioned my lingering sense of dread? The anxiety about professional self-sabotage that hangs around me like a black cloud? My fear of being sucked into the social media muck and losing all sense of proportion – to say nothing of time?  

To reframe my negative emotions, I've turned to paper collage and its creative cousin, metaphor.

If I visualize my website as a colorful garden where I happily potter around most days – nurturing seedlings, pulling out weeds, watering and fertilizing and pruning – I can see Twitter as just another tree in a much larger landscape, one that I have planted for its capacity to attract avian life. Sure, I'm a bit worried about all the noise. Did you know that the English word jargon comes from an Old French word denoting the sound made by twittering birds?  

I've reimagined Instagram's squareish camera logo, meanwhile, as the door to my garden shed / log cabin / mountain chalet / writing studio. That wonky, welcoming Instaportal gives me another metaphor to ponder: perhaps my collage is trying to tell me something about the creative relationship between society and solitude?

As soon I've built up a respectable Twitter/Insta following, I hope to use both platforms to crowdsource future newsletter material. For example:

  • What metaphors for writing does this week's collage invoke for you?

  • What tips and tricks can you recommend to others for writing more productively, playfully, pleasurably, [choose your own adverb]?

  • Most pressing for me at the moment: How do you make the most of Twitter and Instagram without going insane?!

A special shout-out to all the generous colleagues and friends – Michelle Boyd @InkWellRetreats, Karim Khan @KarimKhan_IMHA, Inger Mewburn @thesiswhisperer, Amanda Palmer @amandapalmer, Steven Pinker @sapinker, Margy Thomas @ScholarShape, and Pat Thomson @ThomsonPat, among others – who have encouraged or inspired me to take this scary step.

I hope to see you soon in the newest patch of my garden!


Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year). Not a member? Join the WriteSPACE now and get your first 30 days free.


 
The Cat on the Grammar Mat
 
 
 

Recently I was asked to say a few words at a poetry reading in memory of a former student who died earlier this year.  

I first met Penny back in 2006, when she planted herself in the front row of "Poetry off the Page," an experimental literature course that I was co-teaching with my colleague Michele Leggott.  Penny was smart, sassy, funny, fearless, creative, questioning, collaborative -- in short, the ideal student. 

Penny turned 70 years old that year.

That was a few years before she started performing her poetry in public, her snow-white hair ceremoniously sprayed with streaks of pink or purple or blue. It was well before she established herself as a popular open-mic Master of Ceremonies at the Thirsty Dog pub on seedy Karangahape Road. And it was nearly a decade before she published her first book of poetry, one year shy of her eightieth birthday.

One audacious adventure at a time, Penny became my model for the kind of poet (and person) that I want to be when I grow up.

And her poems were hilarious! Here's one of my favorites, complete with Penny's original salty language and gender-confused feline:

On making sure that your subject and your verb are close together and your object is as near to the left hand side of your sentence as possible

(with a nod to Sam Leith, author of Write to the Point: A Master Class on the Fundamentals of Writing for Any Purpose)

The cat, a black half Burmese half unknown roistering tom from the neighbourhood, chewing and munching on a dead mouse but leaving the head and tail on the Persian rug I had bought in Iran, eyeing me as I looked at her from my position lying on the sofa after eating too much lunch and drinking two glasses of wine, which I never do these days today being an exception, sat, if you can call it sitting when in fact one leg was lifted in the air as she cleaned her bottom impervious to the disgusted gaze of my visitor who works in a sexual health clinic and finds the fact that cats and dogs clean their bottoms with their tongues very unhygienic to observe in a domestic situation, on the mat.

Even a stickler for syntax like me -- yes, I do generally believe that subjects and verbs should hang out close together, but I also appreciate creative deviations from the rule -- can't help but appreciate Penny's sense of humor, her colorful streaks of irreverence sprayed on the white hair of convention.

Rest in peace, Penny Somervaille. We miss you!


Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year). Not a member? Join the WriteSPACE now and get your first 30 days free.


 
Let the Light Shine Through
 
 
 

When I first started making this paper collage, I had no idea how it would turn out -- or what the process was trying to teach me.

I had recently purchased some beautiful art paper featuring black circles pressed into a feathery white surface. Surely, I told myself, I can do something with this. But what? 

First, I tried placing a page from my journal behind the circles: handwritten words glimpsed through handmade paper. Despite its apparent translucency, however, the pulpy white paper proved too opaque for the inky letters to show through. Texture trumped text.

Next, I decided to try gluing colorful origami paper behind the handmade paper. I was staying at a remote farmhouse in Switzerland at the time but managed to acquire from a local grocery store some school glue, a pastry brush, and a pair of nail scissors.

Rather laboriously -- it took me nearly an hour -- I cut solid-colored circles from the origami paper to match the black circles on the art paper. Here's what the back side of the collage looked like after I glued the colored circles in place.

And here's what the finished collage looked like when I flipped it over and laid it flat on a table. The result was disappointing: pleasant but not inspiring. Why had I even gone to all that trouble?

But then I held my collage up to a window. The circles glowed, and everything became clear -- not just why I'd made it but what it could teach me about writing:

  • Keep going.

  • Trust the process.

  • Try new approaches.

  • Let the light shine through!

Perhaps I should have tried writing some inspirational words on the colored circles -- an indistinct poem unfurling in spiraling letters. Would the result have looked brilliant, I wonder, or totally naff? Should I go back now and give it a try: peel away the colored circles and start afresh? 

No, I'll let this one go. That's another writing-related lesson I've learned from my collage practice: sometimes you just have to leave the dried glue in place. Sometimes good enough is good enough. 

Warm thanks to the participants in my recent Creativity Catalyst short course for helping me see the light!


Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year). Not a member? Join the WriteSPACE now and get your first 30 days free.


 
The Shape of Words
 
 
 

My new 6-week virtual writing course, the Creativity Catalyst, launched last weekend, and we've been having a great time playing with arts-based techniques for zhuzzing up our writing processes and products.

Here's one of my favorite exercises from the Poetry module, inspired by Glenn Colquhoun's lovely poem "An Explanation of Poetry to my Father," which includes the following lines:
 

  • The shape of words

    A is the shape of a tin roof on an old church.
    is the bottom of a fat man. 
    is a crab scuttling along the beach.
    is the shape of butterfly wings.

                            ***
    orange is the shape of a round fruit hanging from a tree, a young woman reaching out to pick it, a kitten chasing after its own tail, an old woman weeding her garden, a small boy fishing from a pond, the sun setting over a smooth beach. 

    smoke is a lazy snake crawling towards the sun, two large clouds billowing, a round mouth coughing, a small bird singing in a tree, the eye of a tired child falling asleep. 

    love is one leg planted firmly on the ground, a spare washer for a dripping tap, that beautiful bird flying towards me or away, a broken eggshell opened on the floor.


Take a moment to notice how this poem works, particularly in the final three stanzas.  Each letter of each word -- orangesmokelove -- evokes an everyday object that not only resembles that letter but also speaks to or illuminates some aspect of the word itself. 

It's easy to follow Colquhoun's example:

  1. Choose a word -- not too long -- that represents your current writing project.

  2. Write the word vertically, one letter per line, down the left-hand side of a sheet of paper.

  3. Now describe what each letter looks like, keeping the whole word in mind as you cycle through the possibilities.

  4. Read through your lines and make adjustments as needed.

  5. Hey presto -- you've written a research poem!
     

One of our Creativity Catalyst participants, PhD student and prolific bicycle blogger Nina Ginsberg, produced an exuberant riff on the word Bicycles:

  • spectacles sliding down noses of poses finally seeing things differently; the face-saving yes agreements and yes non-agreements; the woman bent over the fire, the loom, the field, and the baby; an absent-present seeping delta; the tenuous mark of schoolgirl attendance; the line between the have/nots, ride/nots, care/nots, know/nots, what/nots; the pitcher that carries the water, that carries the sustenance, that carries the girl, that carries a country; the pumping hand moves of sweaty, late-night dancehall dancers.
     

I went with the word WriteSPACE:

  • Write is a crooked smile, a scythe cutting through nonsense, a brain-bearing body, a telegraph pole, a spiral of rebirth.

    S     Here our winding road begins,
    P     here we plant our flag
        atop the highest mountain
    C     wrapped in the wor(l)d's embrace 
        pointing forward, forward, forward.

The lines of this poem came to me quickly, but I'm still unpacking their meaning.  Creative activities like this one can help you approach your research from new directions and think more playfully and profoundly about your "serious" writing.  

Sound like fun?  Join us in the Creativity Catalyst

I'd love to see you there.


Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year). Not a member? Join the WriteSPACE now and get your first 30 days free.


 
The Patter of Little Tweets
 
 
 

I couldn't resist bringing little feet (and tweets) into this visual homage to social media savant Pat Thomson, Professor of Education at the University of Nottingham, whose long-running patter blog is already well known to many of my readers.

On Wednesday June 8, Pat joined me on Zoom for a wide-ranging conversation on "Writing and Social Media.” We discussed how academic writers can use social media to advance their writing practice, and I got to hear all about what Pat has learned from her many years of wrangling "the socials." When I quizzed her about my own Twitter and Instagram hesitancy, she assured me that I’ll be well-supported by my social-media-savvy sisters and brothers if I take the plunge!

Here’s WriteSPACE member Nina Ginsberg’s lively account of the live event:

…………….

As a blog writer myself, I was especially looking forward to Helen’s discussion with Pat Thomson. And based on the spirited chat box and participant engagement, I clearly wasn’t the only one!

In this discussion, Pat shared her ideas on the differences between blogging and social media, her processes of selectively using social media, and how she compartmentalizes social media engagement. Pat elaborated on each of these points by drawing on her extensive experience. An example of this is Pat’s observation that people get exhausted after reading a topic for 2-3 blog posts, so that’s when she moves to social media to generate some traction for things that are not immediately apparent or topics that get less engagement – and that tweets can make a connection if the blog title is not driving interest. 

From blogging, we moved to other forms of social media, but mostly focused on Twitter. Pat tweets once on a Monday and once on a Friday and the most useful aspect of Twitter for her is checking who has ‘@’ tagged her into what conversations, because this is more about building a network and community of scholars. Pat avoids certain conversations or topics on Twitter, as these draw unwanted, heated, combative attention (for example ‘feminism’). I really liked Pat’s approach of directly messaging people who pushed back about something she said and how she told them she was not interested in being embroiled in a public argument. A good take-away was to use Twitter to invest and promote other people and their publications to pay it forward, as opposed to getting embroiled in debates.  

This discussion presented a few new ideas for me... I didn’t know about the fractious UK Education schism between the Trads vs the Progs, or that Pat's musician son taught her ideas on crafting/managing careful persona limitations. Hearing about the stickiness of endless self-promotion and building your profile got me thinking about my own academic work, as did the benefits and issues of visibility, vulnerability and vanishing.  

Pat currently has 927 blog posts on her Patter blog, and she is thinking of taking a break when it reached 1,000. A very well-deserved break, too! It was great to see so many attendees for this session. The chat box was firing with ideas, links, and gratitude to both Pat and Helen for giving their expertise so generously online.

…………….

A recording of this WriteSPACE Special Event is now available for members in the WriteSPACE Library.

Not a member yet? Register here to receive an email with the video link.

Better yet, join the WriteSPACE with a free 30 day trial, and access our full Library of videos and other writing resources.


Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year).


 
Writing and Rationality
 
Collage of pinking shears and pinked scraps of paper
 
 

I couldn't resist using a pair of pinking shears to create this paper collage, in homage to my recent WriteSPACE Special Event guest Steven Pinker, the Johnstone Family Professor in Psychology at Harvard University.

The English verb pink, which dates back to the 14th century, means "pierce, stab, make holes in."  But the purpose of pinking shears is not destructive -- quite the opposite.  The zigzag pattern of the blades prevents woven cloth from fraying and produces a decorative edge reminiscent of the common garden flowers called pinks.  

Steven Pinker's prose style, likewise, is incisive yet elegant, hole-punching yet healing, piercing yet humane.  Whether you know him as a distinguished psycholinguist, a fearless social commentator, a consummate prose stylist, or all of the above, I hope you'll be as pleased as I was that he gave up an hour and a half of his precious sabbatical leave to visit us in the WriteSPACE on May 4.

In the first 90 minutes of this live 2-hour Special Event, I engaged Steve in a wide-ranging conversation about his background and evolution as a writer, his personal and professional sense of style, and -- with a nod toward his most recent book, Rationality -- the role of rationality in academic and professional writing.  The final half hour featured a hands-on “reverse engineering” workshop inspired by his 2015 book, The Sense of Style: The Thinking Person's Guide to Writing in the 21st Century.  

Here are some comments made by last week's Virtual Writing Studio participants about the Pinking Shears collage, before I revealed that it had anything to do with Steven Pinker:

  • Marie (Texas, USA):
    Crafting, assembling, designing… Piece by piece, square by square, a mission is underway and a new world unfolds. We will wake up to a newly fashioned environment; not a moment too soon.

  • Nina (Brisbane, Australia):
    A wedding planner swimming! Karen Barad's agential realism uses the concept of "cut-together-apart."

  • Lorna (Scotland, UK):
    I like the jigsaw-like qualities of the pinked edges.

  • Lynne (Brighton, UK):
    The serration creates more edge surface on the blade, which concentrates its cutting power. Compacted, it does more.

  • Anita (Cape Town, South Africa):
    Snipping work into bite sized chunks is a strategy to move work forward.

  • Vicky (Essex, UK):
    It reminds me of how I edited my PhD -- I would restructure by printing out, cutting up, and sticking together.

  • Hussain (Indonesia):
    Lies against purple background with its mouth wide open from exhaustion.

  • Eva (Germany):
    Rethinking a journal article: the open scissors point different directions the article could go; the black frame for requiring a clear framework; and the paper fragments and flowers for playing around creatively with ideas.

  • Ramón (Melbourne, Australia):
    It’s a puzzle, any piece can be matched with any other. Since they are all the same form, there is not just one solution.

And here is WriteSPACE member Nina Ginsberg’s lively account of the live event:

…………….

I found the discussion between Helen Sword and Steven Pinker insightful and inspiring. A few standout ideas for me were Steven’s observations that most writers don't consult style manuals, they consume good prose and devote attention to why it is good, clear and affecting writing – and by default these people assimilate an inventory of good writing. Another gem was Pinker’s comment that at university, it is not the undergraduates that are the ‘bad writers’, but the (post)grads, because they are often drawing on jargon from a small clique of scholars and need to ‘prove their work’ so it is often very hedged and qualified (that's me!). As a teacher, I was impressed with Pinker’s generosity in sharing his Rationality class materials. This made me reflect on alternative ways scholars, teachers and writers can share their work beyond mainstream publication. 

A few other takeaways I garnered were: that Pinker avoids using parenthetical; he is conscious that every new equation included in a book ‘cuts the readership in half’; he harnesses the power of well-placed jokes, humour and concrete, relatable, witty examples to highlight specific concepts...and as always...he knows the importance of having a good ending to paragraphs. At one stage, Pinker mused about the many spatial and temporal contours of prepositions (you fill in a form, but also fill a form out) and that ‘up’ has a completion and vertical ‘sense’ about it...what Pinker called a ‘spectral sense’. I enjoy listening in to other writers ‘think out loud’ like this my favorite example of this is a private recording of Dr Oliver Sacks trying to find the right words as he writes.

*In my draft of this piece, I had this phrase originally in parenthesis, but took it out as a homage to Pinker, but then realized I needed parenthesis if I were to include this annotation in-text, so I popped it here. (Oh, the irony!) ...and there they are again. - argghh! I tried Steven! Your ideas on writing continue to challenge me! NG.

Later on, the conversation turned to Pinker's writing process. He outlined his 6-stage drafting process which included a brain dump, a ‘frankenchapter’ (a term I love and will be using with relish!), sending it his mum to read as she is his trusted go to non-academic reader-feedbacker, then after a few more drafts, he does one last, slow edit for reasoning at the end to improve the prose. To wrap up, Steven shared a few sample texts and explained the deliberate techniques he embedded in the writing and organization. This metathinking about how writers use words, logic and literary devices is what keeps me coming back to WriteSPACE events like this!  

A big thanks to Helen and Steven for sharing their time, expertise and ideas so generously. If you did not attend or have not yet watched the recording, make a cup of tea, get comfortable and enjoy this wonderful discussion about writing and rationality. 

…………….

And a big thanks to you, Nina, for sharing your comments! A video of my conversation with Steven Pinker is now available for members in the WriteSPACE Library.

Not a member yet? Register here to receive an email with the video link.

Better yet, join the WriteSPACE with a free 30 day trial, and access our full Library of videos and other writing resources.


Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year).


 
Weighty Words
 
 
 

Last week, I received an email from John in North Carolina with the subject line "Love the tool, hate the metaphor":

  • Dear Professor Sword,

    I enjoy reading your work and love using the Writer's Diet tool. However, I did want to share my extreme hesitation to use this with my classes. The idea of lean vs. flabby prose promotes a fat-phobic environment. I try to cultivate a place where writers of all sizes feel comfortable, including mentioning in class that the writer's diet is unnecessarily fattist. Have you ever considered updating the image with something more affirming or neutral?

I replied as I usually do, thanking John for taking the time to write and offering a few comments and suggestions:

  1. The phrase "flabby or fit" is meant to refer to muscles, not to body types, and the overall message is a positive, health-focused one: If you want to develop strong muscles, it's best to eat a healthy diet and exercise regularly; likewise, if you want to develop strong sentences, you need build them up with good, nutritious words (not empty calories/clutter) and put them through a vigorous workout.

  2. If, despite this explanation, you and your students still disapprove of the Diet and Fitness metaphor, you can use the blue Settings wheel to change the theme: for example, to Clear Skies ("cloudy or clear?"), Solid Ground ("swampy or solid?"), or Clean House ("cluttered or clear"?).  

  3. Ideally, the online Writer's Diet test should be used as a supplement to the book, not as a stand-alone tool.  At the very least, I would encourage you and your students to spend some time reading my free online User Guide, which explains the key principles behind the test and offers lots of handy hints for getting the most from the tool.

  4. Members of my WriteSPACE virtual writing community get access to a premium version of the Writer's Diet test that produces a customized Action Plan for every sample submitted -- using their preferred theme, of course!  You can try out the Writer's Diet Plus tool by using the discount code WRITERSDIET to get your first month of membership for free.  

But John's question got me thinking. What other metaphors for writing and editing do writers frequently employ, and which of these, like the Writer's Diet, might be open to ontological critique?  

  • Cognitive load:  If you attended my WriteSPACE Special Event last week with psycholinguist Steven Pinker, you'll have heard us talk about cognitive load, a phrase used by psychologists to describe the amount of working memory required by the brain to complete a given task. Long, difficult sentences -- those filled with abstract language, disciplinary jargon, parenthetical phrases, subordinate clauses, and the like -- place a heavy cognitive load on our readers, thereby sapping their mental energy and reducing their comprehension. 

  • Left-branching vs. right-branching sentences:  In an illuminating blog post titled How to Write a More Compelling Sentence, Inger Mewburn (aka the Thesis Whisperer) explains the difference between what linguists call "right-branching" versus "left-branching" sentences: right-branchers start with a subject-verb-object cluster and then add supplementary information, whereas left-branchers pile on all the extras before we even know what the sentence is about. Steven Pinker offers this example of a left-branching sentence, the subject of which, policymakers, does not appear until more than halfway through: "Because most existing studies have examined only a single stage of the supply chain, for example, productivity at the farm, or efficiency of agricultural markets, in isolation from the rest of the supply chain, policymakers have been unable to assess how problems identified at a single stage of the supply chain compare and interact with problems in the rest of the supply chain."  (Steven Pinker, The Sense of Style: The Thinking Person's Guide to Writing in the 21st Century). 

  • The Lard Factor: In his book Revising Prose, Richard Lanham encourages writers to calculate the Lard Factor of an edited piece of prose by subtracting the number of words in the edited sentence from the number of words in the original, then dividing the difference by the original.  For example, if we were to trim the 63-word behemoth quoted above down to 43 words, the Lard Factor (or percentage of excess words eliminated) would be 32%. 

Viewed through a certain kind of critical lens, all of these metaphors are problematic. Cognitive load suggests that light is good, heavy is bad.  The branching sentences metaphor depicts right as good and left as bad (a sinister sign of an implicit bias against left-handed people?) Lanham's Lard Factor exercise labels lean as good and fatty as bad (another "fattist" metaphor?) 

Yet each of these metaphors also reflects a physical reality.  Heavy loads are harder to lift than light ones; the English-speaking brain favors sentences that read, like words on the page, from left to right; lean meat is healthier to eat than fatty meat (unless you're a vegetarian, in which case you probably find the entire Lard Factor metaphor deeply unappealing).

Metaphors can shape us or empower us, lift us up or let us down.  Arthur Quiller-Couch infamously urged writers to murder your darlings -- that is, to commit infanticide against your most cherished sentences.  But we don't need to succumb to that kind of self-punitive advice; nor should we confuse a healthy diet of well-chosen words with an anxiety-inducing starvation diet.  Editing can be a joyful act, with affirmational metaphors to match.

That woman about to be crushed by weighty words?  Take another look.  Maybe that falling boulder is a beachball filled with air, and she's playing beach volleyball!    


Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year). Not a member? Join the WriteSPACE now and get your first 30 days free.


 
Writing, Writing Everywhere
 
a typewriter on a bench in a field
 
 

Greetings from Sydney, Australia -- the first time I've travelled overseas since late 2019.  It feels amazing (and strange) to have my wings on again! 

Back in early 2020, I had recently returned home from travels to South America and all around the South Pacific, and I had upcoming trips planned to North America, Australia, and Europe -- journeys that never came to pass.  Instead, along with hundreds of millions of people worldwide, I found myself locked down out at home, facing an uncertain future and wondering how to go on writing.  

In early April 2020, I invited fellow writers from across the globe to contribute to an online gallery called "Writing in the Time of Covid-19."  You sent me photographs of your computer desks and garden tables, your coffee mugs and keyboard-hogging cats, your wide yet narrow views to the outside world. 

Wendi (USA) included a child and a dog in her photo: "Writing during COVID-19 means I have more company in my writing space."  Juliet (Australia) set herself up to read next to her husband's grave: "Very peaceful and easy to maintain distance from (living) people."  Ineke (UK) improvised an ingenious writing desk constructed from her boyfriend's ironing board.  

Now it's time for a follow-up exhibit: "Writing, Writing Everywhere"! 

Please send me your photos of where you're writing now: the cafe tables, garden benches, and mountaintops where you couldn't go to write at the height of the pandemic two years ago.  

The submission portal will close on May 31. After that, I'll launch our new Writing, Writing Everywhere gallery with an invitation for you to visit online and vote for your favorite photo and caption.

The winner will receive a signed copy of my book Air & Light & Time & Space: How Successful Academics Write (which contains a whole chapter about writing spaces). That's right: I'll send you a hardback, slip-covered, snail-mailed copy of a real book that you can carry with you wherever you go to write.

Here's my submission to the Writing, Writing Everywhere gallery: a photo of the spot where I drafted this post. I can't wait to see yours!


Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year). Not a member? Join the WriteSPACE now and get your first 30 days free.


 
Digital Writing Tools
 
figures representing various digital tools
 
 

Do you use digital tools to improve your writing, or do your digital tools use you? How often do you stop to think about why, how, and when popular editing tools such as Grammarly should be trusted -- or not? If you're a teacher, supervisor, or manager, do you actively encourage your students and/or employees to interrogate the algorithms and assumptions behind such tools?

All of these questions, and more, were addressed during my lively conversation with Dr. Evija Trofimova, creator and curator of the playful Digital Writing Tools resource site, on April 13.

In the first hour of this two-hour event, Evija and I discussed the affordances, flaws, and redeeming features of various digital writing and editing tools, and Evija gave us a guided tour of her charming-yet-critical, stylish-yet-serious website. In the second hour, Evija and I facilitated a hands-on workshop focusing on the pros and cons of five well-known algorithmic tools: Microsoft Editor, Grammarly, ProWritingAid, the Hemingway App, and my very own Writer's Diet test. (We skipped Ginger, which now sits mostly behind a not-very-friendly paywall).

In the second half of the session, we had an opportunity to move into break-out rooms and explore the free version of each writing tools to test their idiosyncrasies, functionality, and usefulness. Our aim was to find out which features worked, which were limiting, which were surprising, and what changed in the results. We then regrouped to share our experiences and what we had discovered.

Some participants noted that the tools can increase curiosity about language and that some surface-level grammatical corrections can be helpful. Other participants pointed to lesser-known features such as “inclusiveness,” which may register different conventions when filters were changed from formal to casual. One group stressed that these are awareness-raising tools, not didactic “answers,” so it’s important to issue a warning to students about the pitfalls of relying on them solely as ‘correction’ tools. A few people mentioned that usability relies on who is using a tool and for what purposes: for example, a naive student using it for a surface level scan as opposed to a professional copy editor revising a monograph. Comparing the tools brought into relief the sensitivity, scope and utility of each tool - for example, one tool might pick up a certain issue, whereas another did not register it at all. We also considered developer changes over time, the impact of “software rot,” and the differences between free, basic, and premium versions. 

A few participants mentioned that users need to be judicious in accepting changes, remaining aware of what the tool can do and how to use it. (No tool is a cure-all!). Also, some tools (such as ProWritingAid) have a huge range of options which might be useful for some writers but overwhelming for others. Although these tools identify problem areas and flag issues, the degree to which each tool actually helps writers put to work the results and statistics generated was challenged; writers need to learn to integrate and improve their expression as part of their writing process when not using the tool. Several teachers who took part in the discussion highlighted the importance of using these tools critically rather than encouraging students to take up the corrections indiscriminately. When used well, these tools can be invaluable in building confidence as well as criticality. 

You may wish to have a play with the free versions of these tools, which you can access using the links above. In several cases, it could be worth your while to download a free app (e.g. the Writer's Diet add-in for MS Word), sign up for a free trial to test a more advanced version of the tool (e.g. ProWritingAid's Microsoft integration), or check whether your university or company has an institutional subscription (e.g. for Grammarly).

Participants also recommended the following tools:

Perfect English Grammar (Grammar checker)

PerfectIt - (paid Editing software)

Readability Statistics (part of Microsoft Word package)

A video of my conversation with Evija is now available in the WriteSPACE Library.

Not a member yet? Register here to receive an email with the video link.

Better yet, join the WriteSPACE with a free 30 day trial, and access our full Library of videos and other writing resources.

Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year).

 
Collage Quilt
 
4 paper collages quilted together
 
 

Today I offer you a puzzle, a poem, and a prompt.

The puzzle

I've assembled a quilt from four of the striking cut-paper collages produced by participants in my online "Collage Making for Writers" workshop back in February. Each was assembled in a matter of minutes using materials that its creator had readily to hand.

Can you match the collages with the artists?  

  1. Writing for me is shooting for the stars, but sometimes being a whirling dervish. The collage sits on my mantle piece and reminds me to take a breath and enjoy the world around me.
    (Jenny Bassett, simulation facilitator and lecturer at the Shepparton Campus of the La Trobe Rural Health School of Nursing and Midwifery, Australia)

  2. The space for writing is a blooming shelter where the inner child plays with colours while protected by ancestral wisdom.
    (Catalina Ortiz, associate professor of urban planning and design at University College London)

  3. The title of my collage is "Revival." The picture is an attempt to raise awareness about the environment.
    (Meriem Guerilli, lecturer in the Département de lettre et langues étrangères at the Université 20 août 1955-Skikda in Algeria)

  4. Sometimes, words and ideas are like a tangled dense jungle: something to wrestle through or to patiently unravel, de-knot, smooth out. The crystal prose I’m trying to unearth? It's all there amidst the seeming chaos.
    (Elaine Lunn, Assistant Professor of Health Services & Systems Research at Duke-NUS, Singapore)


The poem

The artists' blurbs, in turn, inspired me to write a collage-like poem:
 

Collage Making for Writers

unearthing the crystal prose
of ancient wisdom

shooting for the stars
through a tangled jungle

whirling like a dervish
in a blooming shelter

vivid + real
revival


The prompt

Now it's your turn to make a collage, a quilt, or a poem -- or even a collage-quilt-poem -- from words, images, and ideas that you find around you. 

Start by gathering whatever snippets of paper or fragments of text catch your eye, without worrying too much about their meaning or coherence.  Then assemble them into a composition that gives you visual or verbal pleasure.  It's that simple.

But there's another step to the process: the meaning-making stage.  This is when you step back from your creation and let it tell you everything you didn't know you know.

Notice how the pink bunny and the white elephants are moving in the same direction, upwards and onwards? How the potted plant that obscures the child's head resembles a giant eyeball?  How flowers, plants, words, and repeated patterns find their way into every image?  There's another poem there somewhere -- and, no doubt, another collage that could be constructed in response to the images in my found poem.  

Creative exercises like these can help you limber up your mind and sharpen your senses in preparation for more "serious" academic or professional writing. They invite you to experiment, explore, and take note of unexpected juxtapositions that may in turn inspire new revelations.

Warm thanks to Jenny (upper left), Catalina (bottom right), Meriem (bottom left), and Elaine (upper right) for generously sharing their collages.


Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year). Not a member? Join the WriteSPACE now and get your first 30 days free.


 
Write Like Freddie!
 

Valentine’s Day collage by Helen Sword

 
 

If you've attended any of my live Zoom events, you've probably met my dog Freddie, a snow-white bichon frise with a sweet disposition and a jaunty tail.  (Warm thanks to our 9-year-old neighbor Nouriyah for her lifelike drawing).  

No, Freddie doesn't spend long hours at the keyboard as I do.  But he's taught me a lot about how to live, breathe, and flourish as a writer.  

Here are 10 lessons about writing (and life) that I've learned from Freddie. 

1. Always dress for the occasion.

For Freddie, that means wearing a pink bowtie to my birthday party. For me, it means adjusting my writing style to reach my target audience.

2. Don't take yourself too seriously.

Peter and Anna sent this photo from Germany to show Freddie how silly he looks when sculpted out of snow. I guess I'd look pretty silly too.

3. Do yoga. Every day.

Freddie is especially good at the downward-facing dog pose; he also excels at savasana (corpse pose). I wish I had his flexibility and core strength!

4. Take your writing for a walk.

Freddie pulls me out the door several times a day. Every step we take together loosens up my limbs, my thoughts, and my words.

5. Write with friends.

I took this photo while on a writing retreat with my friend and collaborator Selina Tusitala Marsh -- and Freddie, of course. Writing can be a lonely business unless we open up and let others share our space.

6. Stay warm.

And keep your writing warm by touching your words every day, even if only for a brief pat. (Thank you to Sophie Nicholls for this lovely metaphor.)

7. Chill out.

Freddie has mastered the art. I'm still working on it -- especially when I've got a writing dilemma to solve or a deadline to meet.

8. Don't panic when things get messy.

That sticky black sand (and those sticky sentences, that cloying self-doubt) will all brush out eventually.

9. When in doubt, take a nap.

In Freddie's case, that means multiple naps throughout the day. For me, a short 30-minute kip works best to refresh my body and reset my writing brain.

10. Your fatal flaw may also be your superpower!

Freddie hates being left alone and loves to cuddle. He's the most anxious pet I've ever owned -- but also the most affectionate. How can I reframe my own anxieties and flaws and recognize them as my superpowers instead? (Agonizingly slow writer = craft-focused writer. Vulnerable writer = human writer. Etcetera . . . )


Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year). Not a member? Join the WriteSPACE now and get your first 30 days free.


 
What's Your Writing Roadblock?
 

Valentine’s Day collage by Helen Sword

 
 

This shimmering collage, with images by artist Corita Kent and words by poet Bernard Gunther, invites us to think creatively about the barriers that hold us back from taking flight.

How can you move past the "Do Not Enter" signs in your writing life and soar into the future, unencumbered by doubt or fear? How can you turn your avoid dance into a void dance, a celebration of possibilities?

To help you answer these questions, I've designed a new quiz that identifies your writing roadblocks and helps you refocus on the writing goals that inspire you. Get your personalized roadmap to pleasurable, productive writing -- and have some fun along the way.

This new tool is part of my ongoing effort to provide playful, craft-centered writing resources for writers in any genre and at any stage of their career.

See you on the other side!


Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year). Not a member? Join the WriteSPACE now and get your first 30 days free.


 
Writing to Connect
 

Valentine’s Day collage by Helen Sword

 
 

Only connect the poetry and the prose, and both will be exalted.
(E. M. Forster, Howard's End, 1910)

I was honoured and delighted to run this serendipitous WriteSPACE Special Event — a lively, wide-ranging conversation on the theme of “Writing to Connect” with singer-songwriter-author Amanda Palmer — on Tuesday, March 22.

If you're not already familiar with Amanda as the frontwoman of the legendary indie-punk band The Dresden Dolls, perhaps you're among the millions of people who have watched her amazing TED talk on the Art of Asking; or maybe you've read her New York Times best-selling book of the same title; or you might remember hearing about her as the first artist ever to raise more than one million dollars from a Kickstarter campaign.

With Amanda dressed in a flowing kimono and clutching her trusty ukelele, we sat on the sofa in my Auckland study and talked (and sang and riffed) for nearly two hours about authorship, social media, and the art of connecting with various kinds of audiences.


WriteSPACE member Nina Ginsberg captured the conversation:

For this month’s special event, we had over 200 people attend a lively discussion with special guest Amanda Palmer. As a musician and songwriter, Amanda is a solo artist and collaborator and best known for her work with The Dresden Dolls, Evelyn Evelyn, and more recently as Amanda Palmer and the Grand Theft Orchestra.  Amanda is also a well-known author, performer, creative, crowdfunder, collaborator, influencer and public speaker.

After a warm ukulele welcome song, we heard about Amanda’s extensive, explicit and experimental forays connecting art and audience. She and Helen covered a huge range of topics, with a focus on creating, making, and connecting to audience(s). There was much to talk about and the attendees were very engaged. Throughout the session, the chat was overflowing with ideas, suggestions, resources, encouragement and questions and we ended up (happily) going over time.

Amanda explained that she sees her artistic practice as a house. The outside street is ‘the world’, the space where artists sell and share their work. The foyer is where social media resides; the forward-facing living room is ‘the artspace’ where Amanda spends time creating and making; and the kitchen out back, where she takes time to reflect and recharge, is the place where she invites her most trusted supporters. (For Amanda these are her Patreons). The kitchen is a place located away from the world (street) where you can sit with friends at the end of the night with a glass of wine and review the day with support and honesty. It is the kitchen that reveals the process. (See the recording in the WriteSPACE Library to hear Amanda’s full description of this metaphor).

 From there, Amanda and Helen discussed:

  • inpaid labour and creative work as the common ground between artists and academics

  • life lessons from anxious dogs

  • using social media to build and connect to audiences

  • how long (and how much effort) it takes to ‘make/create/write a thing’ versus how long it takes to share and promote it

  • writing for academics, non-academics and the role of blogs, social media and the importance of sticking your toe in and developing a social media practice that has boundaries and supports your art, rather than sucking the life out of it

  • the challenges of voice, legitimacy, vulnerability, visibility, authenticity, and using ‘correct’ vocabulary

  • How she overcame ‘a dark night of the soul’ moment in which she thought ‘I am not qualified to write this book’

  • Who is your audience and how to find (your) voice to connect with people.

Amanda generously shared her experience and advice on using various platforms (Twitter, TED, Tik Tok, Instagram, YouTube, Patreon) and what to consider when ‘sharing yourself’ in the process of putting your work out there. Amanda spends a lot of time inviting people in and engaging with everyone, and this of course led into discussions of how much to share of yourself as a creative and where, how, and when to be vulnerable.

At one stage, Amanda asked the audience if anyone was waiting for permission or instruction from someone else to make the next move. Later she asked: ‘What does my work mean to you? What does it look like to you… the world of Rock ‘n’ Roll and the world of academia?’

Amanda spoke about her creative and writing processes. It took her six weeks to write her book “The art of asking; or, how I learned to stop worrying and let people help”, but over a year to edit due to many ups and downs along the way. She explained how her approaches and identity have developed over time: she used to identity as ‘a musician’, but she now refers to herself using words like ‘connector’, ‘creator’ or ‘broadcaster’ to show how creative agencies blur beyond the distinct limits of only know as a ‘poet’, ‘writer’, or ‘author’.

Quote of the session (Amanda): “All your choices go into the compost of art-writing-making”.

Amanda recalled how her early-career choice of writing an email to fans in the first rather than third person became a pivotal ‘cleave in the road’ moment in deciding what kind of artist she wanted to be. This led to the deeper probing of choosing which voice to write in, why academic writing is historically so cumbersome and the tension between using Plain English and ‘learning the language of a discipline’ - which many attendees could relate to.

Amanda told a number of tales from the crypt that show how her thinking and practices continue to evolve. One was what she learned after a recent Tik Tok video of her passionately singing a song from Encanto went viral, and the amusing and confusing questions it raised. Another was when, as a first-time author, she started thinking: ‘I am not qualified to write this book.’ To counter this, she told herself: “But you have learned something. Don't try and teach people something in this book, just tell them what you learned. You do you, Boo.”

We spent a lot of time talking about audience, connection and being a capable and confident creator – regardless of what you are working on. Amanda often shares with Patreons when she is struggling with her work and explained how the image of ‘a person doing the runway lights’ was helpful for thinking through next steps.

Final one-word poem

We closed out with our usual one-word poem sung by Amanda playing the ukulele as it emerged in the chat:

armadillo, love, empowering, bravery, do, village, sunflower, unexpected, musikology, artcast, confidence, vulnerability, soft, collages, sunmadillo, connection, art, soft belly, broadcast, gesamtkunstwerk, dare, hug, funflower, sunadillo, innocence, explore, backbone, people, natural, heart, spit, merlin, authentic, brené brown, biglove, so awesome.

 A few other ideas bouncing around were:

  • The German word ‘gesamtkunstwerk’ to describe a full(er) body of work.

  • Being selectively vulnerable

  • Slow down, dig in, go for quality

  • The smokescreen of vocabulary

  • Amy Cutty, Brene Brown and Steven Pinker - academics going mainstream

  • The difference between supporting a person/creative and not a product/outcome

  • Seeing hashtag(s) as the internet card catalogue

  • How much of doing social media is ‘work’

  • Is it nobler on the web/to suffer the trolls and comments of outrageous potential?

  • Giving art away is so much like Poetic Mischief in the Park

  • Finding the little breadcrumbs of source or whatever and empowering others to find their own breadcrumb path

  • The idea (possibly myth?) that Kahneman and Tversky would go visit EACH of their critics and design a study WITH them to settle (whatever) question and that's how one of the attendees wanted to grow and challenge themselves - dialectically engaging with people who challenge them

  • Being a ‘Hot Mess Artist’

  • Just write your story - 30 mins a day without references

  • Using ‘I’ is like stepping off the stage to crowd surf as an academic

  • The Queen doesn’t say/use “I” – how lonely

  • How to find your voice …literally, as a singer/performer/artist, and figuratively, in my artistic expression/writing?

  • Lessening the feeling of being inferior, not being academic (enough), and doing something messy

  • The Invention of Yesterday by Ansary (an Afghani-American historian).  Lovely narrative and a favourite of many.

  • How do you refer to your influence [s] in a creative writing piece without spoon-feeding the reader/audience?

  • “We are not nouns, we are verbs. I am not a thing - an actor, a writer - I am a person who does things - I write, I act - and I never know what I'm going to do next. I think you can be imprisoned if you think of yourself as a noun.” Stephen Fry.

  • Being selectively vulnerable

  • Helen’s metaphor: self-preservation (an armadillo) versus openness to new learning (a sunflower). Amanda’s translation: strong back, soft front. Some other suggested variations on the armadillo-sunflower combo were a Funflower or a Sunadillo or an Armi(Sun)flower.

The full video of this inspiring session is now available in the WriteSPACE Library.

Not a member yet? Register here to receive an email with the video link.

Better yet, join the WriteSPACE with a free 30 day trial, and access our full Library of videos and other writing resources.

Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year).