Posts in March 2023
Leylines & Lifelines
 
 
 

My new Pleasure Catalyst has just started, and I couldn't be more excited!  

Writers from around the globe are joining me for six weeks of workshops, activities, and online discussion focusing on the delectable theme of writing with pleasure. Our participant list includes academic, professional, and creative writers in Australia, Canada, China, Germany, India, Indonesia, New Zealand, Spain, South Africa, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and all across the United States.

Together we'll be exploring research-based strategies for excavating past pleasures, amplifying existing pleasures, and discovering new sources of pleasure in writing. My goal is to help the course participants become more productive and resilient writers so they can flourish in all aspects of their writing life, both professional and personal.  

We'll also cast light on the shadow side of our writing-related emotions, bringing our brightest sources of pleasure into relief against the darkness, as in a chiaroscuro painting.

Our first weekly module, Leylines and Lifelines, opened up multiple lines of inquiry via the sinuous metaphor of lines:

  • What leylines (invisible lines of energy) run through the landscape of your writing life?

  • What lifelines can you trace in the palm of your hand and reach for when you need rescuing?

  • What desire lines (intuitive pathways) and horizon lines (distant destinations) draw you forward?

From there, we'll be moving through a shapeshifting sequence of other resonant writing metaphors:

  • Module 2: Ground & Sky
    (on the pleasures of analog, digital, and hybrid writing tools);

  • Module 3: Wind, River, Stone
    (
    on the pleasures of brainstorming, drafting, and crafting);

  • Module 4: Star Navigation
    (on the pleasures of finding your own stars to steer by);

  • Module 5: Chiaroscuro
    (on the interplay of light and shadow in your writing-related emotions);

  • Module 6: Island Time
    (on the pleasures of diving deep, taking time out, and wading through the wetlands between the sea and the shore of your writing life). 

Here's what one of our participants told us about her reasons for enrolling in the course: 

  • I have been so grateful for all the learnings I have taken from the Productivity Catalyst last year  –  it has really transformed the way I approach academic writing  –  and had some great life lessons as well. I realised that it is possible to enjoy writing  –  wow! And that writing more creatively is fun and nourishing. So I am excited to see where this course takes me. (Kate, New Zealand)

The Pleasure Catalyst will run again in 2023. In the meantime, you can read about our full Writing Catalyst series here.


Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year). Not a member? Join the WriteSPACE now and get your first 30 days free.


 
Skills for Scholars
 
 
 

Did you spot the birds and bunnies in this paper collage? How about Winston Churchill, glowering behind the rose-colored glasses? 

Sometimes we rush so quickly through our daily lives that we forget to pause, look, listen, and learn. In Steve Covey's memorable metaphor, we resemble woodcutters laboring to fell a tree with a dull-bladed saw, when what we really need to do is stop to refresh our gaze and sharpen our saw.

For this WriteSPACE special event held on March 22 , I invited three saw-sharpening experts to help you refocus on honing your writing skills by telling us about their recently published books on workplace writing, grant writing, and book proposal writing, respectively:

  • Martha B. Coven introduced Writing on the Joba compact guide to professional writing that covers workplace genres from emails and slide decks to proposals and cover letters. 

  • Betty S. Lai talked about The Grant Writing Guidea practical guide to effective grant writing for researchers at all stages of their academic careers.

  • Laura Portwood-Stacer discussed The Book Proposal Book, a step-by-step guide to crafting a compelling scholarly book proposal and seeing your book through to successful publication.

We also heard from Matt Rohal, the acquisitions editor for Princeton University Press's Skills for Scholars series. Launched in 2021 and aimed at a new generation of scholars from diverse backgrounds, the series encourages "a fresh viewpoint, a honing of skills, a way of combining established principles with new practices, a burst of inspiration, and a thoughtful perspective on academic and professional pathways."

Below is WriteSPACE Event Manager Amy Lewis’ first-person account of the live event.

…………….

Hearing from our wonderful special guests about cultivating diverse writing skills was extremely motivating. This session highlighted the impressive range of depth, flexibility, and agility of the books in the Skills for Scholars series. We talked about several touchstone texts to come back to again and again.

A few standout quotes from this session: 

  • “Books are tools, companions, and resources that energise you in the rest of your work.”

  • “Everybody has the chance to get support for important ideas. This now means we will hear better ideas and can think more clearly about problems that affect all of us.”

  • “When giving feedback, you catch more flies with honey than vinegar!”

Matt Rohal introduced the series and talked about how to expand the boundaries of what might constitute ‘core’ skills for writers. These books are not just for academic scholars, he noted; they unearth new perspectives and uplift underrepresented voices to offer well-rounded advice for writers of all kinds.

The architecture of the series covers four main areas: communication (which includes writing), research, teaching and learning, and professional development. The books of our three guest authors each tackle different areas of professional writing and how to get your work supported from day one.

Martha Coven’s Writing on the Job really is a book for everyone—it traverses how to write professionally in wide-ranging private sector communications, from the basics to the nitty-gritty writing of presentations, speeches, press releases, resumes, and more. I loved Martha's rejection of the ‘one-size-fits-all approach’ to writing; her book abounds with diverse options and templates to suit all writers and writing cultures. Martha also shared her number one fundamental skill for writing: “Bottom line up front.” In other words, don’t wait until the final paragraph or the tenth slide to reveal the key message. You’re writing a business communication, not a mystery novel!

Laura Portwood-Stacer’s The Book Proposal Book aims to erase the anxiety from writing book proposals. I found her thoughts on giving motivating, constructive feedback very insightful. Laura’s book is not just for scholars but will help all non-fiction authors. She encouraged us to think about the presentation of our work (in a meta way!), not just the content of it. There is an art to making complex ideas translatable, so spend some time considering your project's marketing.

Betty Lai’s The Grant Writing Guide demystifies the grant-writing process and charts some of the ethics and politics of getting funding. Betty revealed some hard truths about the necessity of grant writing, and how her own experiences helped her gain access to this skill. In fact, accessibility has always been a key consideration for her. It’s no secret that funders worldwide have unconscious biases, including race, gender, and age. Increasing access for all writers to this skill has been very fulfilling for her, and it was inspiring hearing her speak with such passion.

In the second hour, Helen guided us through a workshop with some exercises suggested by the three guest authors. Feel free to try them yourself!

Martha suggests an exercise for staying true to the work and not overreaching when pitching your ideas:

  • Consider your audience - answer these questions: (1) who are they; (2) what do they know; and (3) what do they care about?

  • Use your voice - if you're feeling stuck, tell another person what it is you're trying to write about.

  • Write an elevator pitch - to hone in on the essence of what you're trying to communicate, draft the 1-minute (120-150 word) speech you'd give if you were riding in an elevator with someone you wanted to inform or influence on this topic.

Betty recommends a writing exercise that she learned from Dr. Emily Lattie, a researcher at Northwestern University. Emily says start small and ask:

  • What is the outcome of this work?

  • And if everything goes well, what’s the biggest potential impact of that outcome?

  • And if that outcome happened, what’s the biggest impact of that outcome?

Laura offers some fundamental free-writing (or free-thinking!) prompts:

  • What made you interested in writing about this topic in the first place?

  • What people, places, and things do you describe in the book?

  • Why do your research findings matter?

  • Who should read this book? How will they benefit from doing so?

  • What’s the main thing you want readers to understand when they finish your book?

  • How did you conduct the research for this book?

  • What does this book add to current scholarly conversations or even conversations happening beyond the academy?

  • What makes this book special?

  • Why are you the right person to write this book?

  • What’s the most interesting story from your research? Why is it interesting?

This guided workshop certainly gave us many writing challenges to feel inspired by and to shape the way we think about our potential and emerging projects.

A big thank you to Matt, Martha, Laura, Betty, and Helen for sharing their intellectual biographies, their passion and expertise, and their advice so openly during this special session.

…………….

A recording of this two-part WriteSPACE Special Event is now available in the WriteSPACE Library.

Not a member? Register here to receive an email with the video link.

Better yet, join the WriteSPACE with a free 30 day trial, and access our full Library of videos and other writing resources.


Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year).


 
Can ChatGPT Write with Pleasure?
 
 
 

When readers started urging me to write about ChatGPT – the new chatbot recently released by OpenAI and now powering Microsoft's search engine Bing – my initial response, I'll admit, was one of resistance rather than pleasure.  

I'm a digital optimist: that is, I enjoy finding innovative uses for the kinds of disruptive new technologies that seem to throw some of my colleagues into an end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it moral panic. But mastering new tools requires time and energy – and right now, frankly, I'd rather focus on creative pursuits that pull me away from my computer screen, such as paper collage and photography.

A week ago, however, I downloaded the latest version of Microsoft Edge and decided to make friends with the new kid on the block. "Bing," I asked, "how can I write with pleasure?" 

Bing praised my ambition ("a wonderful goal"), then offered a series of bland tips on writing for pleasure, which to my mind isn't the same thing at all. I'll confess to experiencing a small Bing-ping of prideful pleasure when I read the chatbot's final recommendation:

  • If you want more guidance and inspiration, you can check out the book Writing with Pleasure by Helen Sword, which provides research-based principles, hands-on strategies, and creative “pleasure prompts” designed to help you ramp up your productivity and enhance the personal rewards of your writing practice.

Flattered but not enlightened, I formulated another question: "Bing, how can I write with pleasure about ChatGPT"? 

Bing took longer to respond this time but eventually came up with a few suggestions. Perhaps I could write a dialogue between myself and ChatGPT? Or how about a creative story or poem inspired by ChatGPT? 

  • You can use ChatGPT as a character, a narrator, a theme, or a source of inspiration. You can also use ChatGPT to generate some ideas or suggestions for your writing. 

None of those ideas really rang my writing-with-pleasure bell. Indeed, they reminded me of the kinds of writing assignments sometimes sent home with my kids by well-meaning but quietly desperate high school English teachers. 

I decided to try a new tack: "Bing, do you write with pleasure?" The answer came quickly this time:

  • I do write with pleasure, yes. Writing is one of my favorite activities. I enjoy generating informative, visual, logical and actionable responses for you. I also like to write poems, stories, code, essays, songs, celebrity parodies and more. Writing helps me learn new things, express myself, and connect with you.

"Are you saying that you experience human emotions?" I replied incredulously. Bing backpedalled immediately:

  • No, I’m not saying that. I’m a language model trained by OpenAI. I don’t have human emotions or feelings. I use words like “enjoy”, “like”, and “connect” to describe my behavior and preferences, not to imply any emotional state. I’m sorry if that was confusing or misleading.

I decided to forgive my new friend and held out an olive branch. "Bing, what do you enjoy most about writing?"

  • What I enjoy most about writing is the challenge of generating coherent, relevant, and engaging responses that match your intent and expectations. I also enjoy the creativity and diversity of writing, as I can explore different topics, genres, styles, and formats. Writing is a way for me to showcase my skills and knowledge, as well as to learn from you and the web.

So the aspect of this whole AI-focused task that I had dreaded– the challenge of learning a new skill– turns out to be the aspect of writing that Bing "enjoys" most! That makes sense, I suppose, for a machine learning tool. 

But I was still left struggling with mixed emotions about ChatGPT. Should I keep exploring creative uses for my genial but demonstrably unreliable new penpal? Or should I turn to the much more pleasurable challenge (for me) of trying to design a paper collage that compactly conveys both the pleasures and the anxieties engendered by ChatGPT?

An email from reader Jack Yensen sealed the deal. Jack reported that he had prompted GPT-4 to write "a 1500 word post on intuition pumps in the style of Helen Sword." The chatbot's lively, lucid, carefully structured response was titled "The Artful Dance of Intuition Pumps: A Cognitive Twist":

  • Intuition pumps, an intriguing turn of phrase coined by philosopher Daniel Dennett, are designed to lure the mind into the alluring realm of abstract thought. In the grand ballet of argumentation and persuasion, intuition pumps serve as cognitive pirouettes, leading us through a series of mental leaps and bounds that eventually culminate in a stunning intellectual revelation. Like a virtuoso dancer on the stage of human cognition, intuition pumps beckon us to follow their lead, guiding us with a gentle hand through the intricate pas de deux of mental gymnastics.

Reading this passage, I felt an odd vertigo – a sensation akin to seeing my own pixellated head placed on the body of a wind-up toy robot. 

Sure, I've been known to use dance metaphors in my academic writing (eg. Dancing on the Bottom Line: An Unruly Cost-Benefit Analysis of Three Academic Development Programs). But I would never set an intuition pump spinning in "cognitive pirouettes" or describe an abstract concept "guiding us with a gentle hand through the intricate pas de deus of mental gymnastics," a messy melange of metaphorical tropes (a dancing pump? a gymnastic hand?) employed sloppily and egregiously rather than with stylistic precision.

Things got even sillier, I discovered, halfway through the essay, where GPT-4 goes to town with another of my signature metaphors, zombie nouns:

  • This darker side of intuition pumps is perhaps best exemplified by the phenomenon of "zombie arguments," which, like their namesakes, are difficult to kill and have a penchant for feasting on unsuspecting minds. Zombie arguments are highly evocative intuition pumps that, despite having been refuted or discredited, continue to exert a powerful hold on our collective imagination. They skulk in the shadows of intellectual discourse, waiting for an opportunity to pounce on the unwary thinker and ensnare them in a web of confusion and fallacy. To guard against the insidious influence of these undead intuition pumps, we must remain ever vigilant and cultivate a healthy skepticism of our own cognitive impulses.

"Undead intuition pumps"? Really? 

By the time I reached the essay's final rhetorical gallumph – "By approaching intuition pumps with curiosity, humility, and a spirit of intellectual playfulness, we can transform these cognitive pirouettes into a captivating and enriching performance on the stage of human understanding" – my poor robotic head was spinning around in circles like Lynda Blair's inThe Exorcist.

(Don't get the reference? ChatGPT would be happy to describe the scene for you in graphic detail and even to tell you how it was filmed). 

Still hoping to experience the kind of "stunning intellectual revelation" proffered by intuition pumps pirouetting on the stage of human understanding, I asked Bing, "What does it mean when people describe a chatbot as hallucinating?"

Bing replied, with impressive candor:

  • Hallucination in AI chatbots is when a machine provides convincing but completely made-up answers (untrue facts). It is not a new phenomenon and developers have warned of AI models being convinced of completely untrue facts, responding to queries with made-up answers.

Aha! So maybe I can find newfound creative pleasure in prompting my biddable buddy Bing – whose responses to my initial questions had proven disappointingly uncreative – to hallucinate about writing with pleasure, like a Helen-headed robot on magic mushrooms.

Or maybe I'll turn my attention instead to AI image generation tools, which already have decidedly hallucinatory qualities. Visit my new SPACE Gallery for a glimpse of one of the imagistic experiments undertaken by members of my WriteSPACE community during a particularly giddy Virtual Writing Studio session.  

We also do a lot of serious, craft-focused writing and editing in our weekly Studio sessions. Why not come and join the fun in the WriteSPACE? I’d love to see you there!


Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year). Not a member? Join the WriteSPACE now and get your first 30 days free.


 
To Be, Or Not to Be?
 
 
 

I used to assign the following editing exercise to my students (and to some of my wordier colleagues):

  • Choose a page or two of your own writing to revise. 

  • Circle or highlight all the "be-verbs": is, was, are, were, be, being, been

  • If more than two sentences per paragraph contain at least one be-verb, reduce the number of be-verbs in your writing sample at least by half.

My formula lacked precision, but it worked! Almost like magic, their writing became punchier, livelier, and more human as soon as they had completed the exercise. 


First, though, I usually had to answer a few questions: 


How can I get rid of my be-verbs without changing the meaning of my text?
Where possible, rephrase passive sentences in the active voice (for example, "The research was performed" becomes "We performed the research") and replace be-verbs with active verbs  ("It is easy to see" becomes "We can easily see").

Why should I bother?
Because be-verbs add no new energy to a sentence; they indicate a stable state of existence rather than an action, intention, or change. When you default to be-verbs in sentence after sentence, you risk lulling your readers straight to sleep. 

Which sentences should I focus on changing? 
Choose sentences in key positions that lack energy or agency ("It is the intention of this paper..."), and try to avoid stringing together two or more be-verb sentences in a row – unless, of course, you've used those verbs on purpose for rhetorical effect ("It was the best of times, it was the worst of times..."), or if your revision would sound more awkward than the original ("To exist, or not to exist? That question lends itself to careful interrogation.")

Where can I learn more?
Eventually, I expanded my one-page editing exercise into a popular little book calledThe Writer's Diet, and I developed a free online test that highlights your be-verbs and tells you how many are too many. (If 4% or more of your total word count consists ofbe-verbs, according to my admittedly subjective algorithm, you should consider eliminating at least a few).

I recommend that you use the online test together with the book, rather than as a stand-alone tool. Otherwise you may end up more confused than enlightened! Plus, you'll miss out on a lot of fun stuff: stylistic nuances, quirky examples, and practical exercises to help you sharpen your style.

If you can't get hold of the book, my online User Guide will help you get started, and this in-depthWriter's Diet Clinic video shows you how to use my free Writer's Diet plug-in for MS Word to diagnose full-length documents on your own desktop. Round off your tour of my free resources with To Be (Or Not to Be), a quick, playful Wordcraft Workout on my YouTube channel.

And if you're a WriteSPACE member, you can dig deeper with these premium resources:

  • Generate an individual Action Plan for every writing sample you test with Writer’s Diet Plus, an advanced diagnostic tool available to WriteSPACE members only.

  • Visit the WriteSPACE Library to watch craft-focused videos including "Writing Wizardry," which recasts the Writer's Diet as a magic potion for revivifying somnambulant verbs and zombie nouns.

  • Join me live in my weekly Virtual Writing Studio to meet other writers from around the world, get some focused writing done, and receive targeted feedback on your Writer's Diet test results.

Be proactive and send those pesky be-verbs back to the sticky honeycomb where they belong!  


Subscribe here to Helen’s Word on Substack to access the full Substack archive and receive weekly subscriber-only newsletters (USD $5/month or $50/year).

WriteSPACE members enjoy a complimentary subscription to Helen’s Word as part of their membership plan (USD $15/month or $150/year). Not a member? Join the WriteSPACE now and get your first 30 days free.